Simpson’s links run through Monken, who recruited him to Georgia and later spent time with the Ravens; Monken also has historical ties to Simpson’s father from Southern Miss. The loose connections kept Simpson on the radar for a potential No. 6 or No. 24 pick, but the Browns have shown no clear inclination to select him early or at all.
That drift away from Simpson has been welcomed by former coach and analyst Lance Reisland, who argues the Browns should target Garrett Nussmeier instead. On a Cleveland radio show, Reisland said Nussmeier would be a better fit in this quarterback class, arguing he “works a little better under pressure.”
The context of a weak quarterback class compounds the decision. Reisland noted that many prospects look solid within structure but lack elite traits when the pocket collapses, making it risky to chase an early pick at quarterback when the top options aren’t clearly standout.
Browns watchers have also noted that Nussmeier’s junior tape could be compelling enough to gamble on. In 2024, he led the SEC in completions and attempts and threw for 4,052 yards with 29 touchdowns against 12 interceptions, although an early-season abdominal injury hampered him. His mix of production and potential has kept him in the conversation as a viable target.
Still, questions remain about Nussmeier’s size and durability. Reisland acknowledged the talent, but cautioned that he isn’t an especially large quarterback, which raises concerns about absorbing hits at the NFL level. The debate hinges on whether his upside justifies the risk compared with Simpson’s traits and pedigree.
With a quarterback group that lacks clear, elite signal-callers and the Browns’ obvious needs elsewhere, the decision may come down to whether the team prioritizes Nussmeier’s junior-tape upside over Simpson’s name and ties. In a weak class, teams often bet on upside that aligns with their evaluation of the backup plan for Deshaun Watson.
