Entering November 10, the Raiders could realistically be around 3-6 or 4-5, which might push them toward selling at the trade deadline. Quarterback Kirk Cousins has played very well for Las Vegas this season, ranking second in the NFL in passing touchdowns with 12. At 38 years old, he continues to be an above-average starter. The Raiders also have rookie No. 1 pick Fernando Mendoza waiting in the wings. While the team appears to prefer a full season of Mendoza, sustained losses could prompt a quarterback shake-up.
NFL analysts have suggested Cousins could become a popular trade option in the coming weeks. One note often cited is that if a playoff-contending team suffers a quarterback injury in the next three to four weeks, the Raiders might be among the first teams approached to acquire Cousins for the remainder of the season.
Would the Raiders actually trade Cousins? Moving him would be a major shift. Even if Mendoza is ready to step in, Cousins would still hold value as a backup or potential trade asset. If a team facing quarterback injuries offers a substantial return, it could make sense for Las Vegas. The Raiders aren’t actively shopping him, but they would consider a strong offer. While Mendoza represents the future, Cousins has delivered strong performances for the club.
Potential suitors for Cousins include teams that could be seeking an immediate upgrade. The Minnesota Vikings, who already have a strong standing and offensive system familiarity with Kevin O’Connell, could explore bringing back a familiar starter if injuries mount. If Kyler Murray remains limited by injury and the Vikings believe Cousins would fit their offense, they could be a match. Another possibility could involve the Baltimore Ravens, who might consider a veteran option if Lamar Jackson were to miss time. Divisional considerations make a deal unlikely with Las Vegas, but a favorable price could alter the calculus.
Denver, a division rival with a strong roster but inconsistent quarterback play, could theoretically pursue Cousins as a one-year rental, though any such move would require a premium price.
Note: The above scenarios reflect common trade dynamics and team needs discussed by analysts; no definitive trade has occurred, and team intentions can change with the season.