A new dispute over key evidence could complicate the league’s investigation. Attorneys representing Jacobs’ ex-girlfriend filed a motion to seal evidence and discovery materials in the criminal case, on behalf of the woman identified as ANM. The filing was submitted by the law firm Raff Law, LLC and connected to the matter of State of Wisconsin v. Joshua Cordell Jacobs. The request aims to protect the plaintiff’s privacy, especially in light of Jacobs taking responsibility for his actions in the criminal proceeding.
The motion could hinder the public availability of surveillance video linked to the case. That footage matters because the NFL is seeking access to evidence as part of its separate review under the Personal Conduct Policy. The league previously indicated it wanted to interview Jacobs and was pursuing legal avenues to obtain the surveillance video before making a disciplinary decision.
The criminal case concluded last week. Jacobs pleaded no contest to both misdemeanor charges in Brown County Circuit Court on September 10. He was convicted on the battery charge and fined $1,000, while the criminal damage charge was resolved through a deferred judgment agreement. The agreement included no contact with the woman, mandatory counseling and supervision, restitution, and a commitment to avoid further criminal acts. Jacobs stated in court that he understood the seriousness of the situation and took responsibility.
However, the NFL’s review remains active. A league spokesperson stated that the matter continues under the Personal Conduct Policy and that there is no change to Jacobs’ status, as he remains on the Commissioner’s Exempt List. The designation prevents him from practicing and playing but allows instruction and use of team facilities for therapy and rehabilitation, with the team’s permission.
League reports indicated that the time on the exempt list could count toward any eventual suspension. The Personal Conduct Policy outlines a six-game baseline for certain offenses involving assault, battery, or domestic violence, though final discipline can vary based on circumstances.
Green Bay opened the season without Jacobs, with a trio of running backs—MarShawn Lloyd, Chris Brooks, and Kaleb Johnson—sharing duties behind the offensive line. The coaching staff described the approach as a committee. The team later added depth behind the group by trading for Kaleb Johnson.
Jacobs had already been sidelined for much of training camp due to a groin injury, but the legal case and league review quickly overshadowed football status.
The latest court filing does not determine whether Jacobs will be suspended or when he could return. It could, however, complicate the NFL’s effort to obtain evidence before making a disciplinary decision.
With no return date in sight, Green Bay must assess the impact of his absence. Jacobs has been a central figure for the team since he arrived in 2024, delivering substantial production and involvement in both rushing and receiving plays. In recent seasons, his production included multiple high-yardage campaigns and a significant share of the team’s total touchdowns and offensive output.
Replacing Jacobs presents a substantial challenge. The Packers have leaned heavily on him, and his absence leaves a void that the current committee of backs must try to fill. While Green Bay hopes for a future return, the team must prepare for various scenarios, including continued absence.
The situation remains ongoing, with league reviews and legal proceedings intersecting in ways that could influence any final disciplinary decision. Green Bay now faces the task of evaluating the cost of Jacobs’ absence and adjusting their backfield strategy accordingly.
