Viens noted that Seattle was among the other teams that pursued Crosby at the time, and he indicated the Seahawks have checked in with Crosby several times over the past year or more. This isn’t a sudden shift in stance for Seattle; rather, it aligns with a history of ongoing inquiries. The interest factor is further influenced by the Raiders’ trajectory under first-year head coach Klint Kubiak, which could bring Crosby back into focus as the season progresses and the trade deadline approaches.
The interest in Crosby is underscored by his recent contract: a three-year, $106.5 million extension with Las Vegas signed in 2025. Crosby has established himself as one of the NFL’s most disruptive edge players since entering the league in 2019. Through seven seasons, he accumulated 69.5 sacks in 110 games with 104 starts, a production level that has consistently placed him among the league’s elite pass rushers. This level of impact is precisely why teams continually monitor his availability and why the Seahawks and other contenders might revisit conversations about his fit and price.
Earlier reporting highlighted Crosby’s perceived movement as a focal point of off-season chatter. An ESPN report described Crosby’s supposed trade to Baltimore and the subsequent events, including Baltimore’s decision to back out after medical concerns arose during Crosby’s physical. The Rams were then identified as having pursued Crosby before he appeared to shut down trade chatter, while the Raiders and Ravens had previously struck a deal involving two first-round picks that ultimately did not go through.
Seattle’s interest in Crosby is notable not only for its audacity but also for its precedent. In March 2025, Sports Illustrated reported that Seattle had opened trade discussions with Las Vegas, proposing a package built around Geno Smith and DK Metcalf in a bid to land Crosby. Those negotiations were rejected by the Raiders, who affirmed Crosby was not available. Yet the Seahawks persisted in exploring possibilities, culminating in a later trade that sent Smith to Las Vegas for a third-round pick. This history demonstrates that Seattle has consistently considered a blockbuster move for Crosby, signaling that renewed talks could arise if circumstances align.
Viens’ latest remarks come as a reminder that the Seahawks’ pursuit of Crosby is not a fleeting rumor but part of an extended pattern of interest. Whether a new, practical pathway to Crosby emerges will likely depend on several factors, including how the Raiders perform under Kubiak, Crosby’s own stated preferences, and the financial practicality of any potential deal. The price for Crosby remains high, reflecting the premium attached to a player of his caliber. The Ravens’ and Raiders’ past discussions—a pairing of two first-round picks in a previous deal that was halted by medical concerns—also looms large in any calculation of a potential return to the market for Crosby.
If Seattle chooses to revisit the possibility, it would require a sizable investment and a carefully crafted plan to entice the Raiders to part with Crosby again. Given Crosby’s production and his demonstrated desire to stay with Las Vegas, any renewed bid would have to present compelling compensation and strategic alignment with Seattle’s roster and cap situation. Nonetheless, the Seahawks’ history of ongoing inquiries makes such a scenario plausible, especially as the trade deadline approaches and teams reassess their championship windows.
In sum, Seattle’s involvement in Maxx Crosby’s trade discussions has not vanished from the conversation. The door remains open, and Viens’ reporting suggests that Seattle could re-enter the market for Crosby if the Raiders’ performance and the broader trade landscape create an opportunity that fits the Seahawks’ long-term plans. As the season unfolds and the deadline nears, any renewed pursuit would likely hinge on balancing Crosby’s high value with Seattle’s strategic needs and cap constraints.
