Former NFL quarterback Dan Orlovsky weighed in during analysis of Maye’s shaky start, suggesting that Hurts would have handled the game differently. In the season opener, Maye finished 23 of 33 for 178 yards, one touchdown, and three interceptions, with a late, game-sealing interception in the red zone.
Orlovsky asserted that Maye needed to “grow up” and make more mature decisions on the field, while also making a pointed comparison: that Hurts does not lose that game. He described the Hurts-versus-Maye narrative as pivotal, arguing that Hurts’ steady presence would have produced a different outcome, and implied that Maye still has room to mature.
The discussion around Hurts centers on his steady playstyle, which typically yields a low turnover rate and a win-oriented approach. While the Eagles’ defense has often provided support, Hurts is known for managing games efficiently and taking advantage of opportunities when they arise. In contrast, Maye’s debut highlighted the challenges he faced under pressure, despite the Patriots’ ability to limit Seattle’s scoring to 13 points.
This early-season assessment keeps the debate alive: Hurts’ leadership and decision-making are seen by many as a distinguishing factor in close games, while Maye’s ceiling may be influenced by his ability to handle high-pressure moments and protect the football. The outcome of Maye’s development in the early portion of the season remains a key storyline as both teams navigate the NFL schedule.
As Maye progresses, he has opportunities to rebound and demonstrate growth, and the Hurts-Maye dialogue will likely continue to evolve based on performance in upcoming weeks. For now, proponents of Hurts point to his proven track record in clutch situations and his overall efficiency, whereas Maye’s trajectory will depend on continued improvements and experience at the professional level.
