Klatt expressed his frustration on social media, noting that Louisville tied the game late against No. 9 Ole Miss after trailing by two touchdowns, before losing 41-38 on a game-winning field goal as time expired. He argued that Louisville’s strong showing against a highly regarded opponent deserved more respect in the poll, suggesting that a team should move up after a win and that losses should lead to a drop, rather than allowing teams with close losses or late-game thrills to be ranked far higher.
The discussion highlighted a broader concern with the AP poll’s methodology and consistency. Klatt questioned whether voters were reacting to Week 1 performances or sticking to preseason expectations, pointing to teams like Indiana, Miami, LSU, Iowa, Utah, and Virginia as examples where adjustments in the rankings seemed warranted.
Michigan’s drop was attributed to offensive struggles in their season opener against Western Michigan, including a late defensive stand that secured the win. Klatt’s main contention, however, centered on Louisville’s placement at No. 24, arguing that their performance against Ole Miss merited a higher position given the quality of their opponent and the competitive effort shown.
Jeff Brohm has led Louisville to consistent nine-win seasons over the past three years, and Klatt contended that the Cardinals’ progress and performance against a strong SEC opponent should have been reflected more accurately in the poll rankings. He also criticized the poll broadly for not adjusting sufficiently to results from Week 1.
Looking ahead, Louisville would have an opportunity to redeem themselves in their next game against Villanova on September 11, while Ole Miss prepared to host Charlotte following their close call against Louisville.
Note: This summary reflects Klatt’s publicly discussed viewpoints on the AP poll and does not include any promotional content, author bios, or source attributions.
