A national-media debate sparked after the 2026 NFL Draft, with some arguing the Bears should trade Bradbury to open a path for Jones, while opponents warn that such a move would be short-sighted. Proponents of keeping Bradbury point to the risk of weakening a solution that already exists, especially with Bradbury under a one-year contract and Jones still unproven in real-game action. An executive cited by The Athletic echoed this cautious approach, emphasizing the importance of knowing Jones is the guy before moving Bradbury.
Key considerations include:
– Bradbury’s veteran leadership and familiarity with top linemen, providing a safety net as Jones develops.
– The potential value of Bradbury as a trade asset only if Jones proves ready, avoiding the disruption of a position that just found stability.
– Johnson’s intent to maximize competition and depth, ensuring multiple viable options at center throughout the season.
Overall, the Bears’ current strategy focuses on evaluating Jones in a real-game context while preserving Bradbury as a reliable veteran and potential trade asset only if Jones is clearly ready to assume a starting role.
Key Takeaways:
– Bears double-drafted at center to secure long-term stability and immediate depth.
– National media critiques trade Bradbury, but industry insiders favor preserving current continuity.
– Coach Ben Johnson prioritizes competition and roster flexibility at center to optimize the offensive line.
