The decision to take Iheanachor drew scrutiny, with analysts labeling the pick a potential reach given his limited football experience. Born in Nigeria, Iheanachor transitioned to football in college, starting 31 games for Arizona State and projected as a long-term contributor on an offense line that is rebuilding after injury setbacks and free-agent departures.
Reaction from Pittsburgh media was mixed. Some critics argued the Steelers had little choice after Philadelphia traded up to select Lemon, effectively derailing Plan A and narrowing the team’s options. Others questioned whether the selection addressed the immediate needs on the offensive line, particularly with Broderick Jones facing an injury setback and Isaac Seumalo leaving in free agency.
Steelers beat writers and loyal followers criticized the front office for not matching offers or capitalizing on Lemon’s fall, suggesting a more thorough plan could have yielded a broader, sooner impact on the roster. The team now shifts focus to Day 2, aiming to maximize value with four remaining picks across rounds 2 and 3.
In evaluating Iheanachor’s development, Pittsburgh faces the challenge of balancing immediate contributing depth with long-term projection. If Iheanachor’s transition to the Steelers’ system progresses smoothly, he could grow into a pivotal interior and tackle role as the line evolves around him. The coming selections will be watched closely to see how the Steelers address their remaining offensive-line depth and pass-catching needs.
