Filice’s scenario would see the Browns, under first-year head coach Todd Monken, capitalize on a rebuild mode by shifting back three spots to No. 9. In this arrangement, Cleveland would still land Tate, who many analysts view as the top receiver in the 2026 class, addressing a receiver room that struggled to generate 100-yard games last season.
The proposed No. 9 selection of Carnell Tate is supported by notable projections, including NFL Network analyst Daniel Jeremiah, who ranks Tate among the top prospects for 2026. Jeremiah highlights Tate’s height, length, play speed, and production, arguing he could contribute immediately to Cleveland’s vertical passing game.
Under Filice’s trade-back plan, the Browns would also gain an additional top-75 pick, offering greater flexibility to address needs beyond wide receiver. The move would align with broader speculation that Cleveland may pursue multiple avenues to strengthen a roster still in transition under Monken’s leadership.
In this hypothetical draft scenario, the Chiefs would reportedly move up to No. 6 to select Miami edge rusher Rueben Bain Jr., freeing No. 9 for Tate. While such sequencing is speculative, it illustrates how teams could realign positions to land premier talents while allowing others to fill different strategic needs.
While Tate falling to No. 9 remains unlikely, pundits note that draft dynamics—such as prior selections at other positions—could create a window for Cleveland to secure a top receiver while preserving additional picks. Other analysts, including Mel Kiper Jr., place Tate high on their boards, reflecting varying opinions on how the board might unfold.
Regardless of the likelihood, the concept of a back-loaded first round that still nets a premier target would be viewed as a strong organizational move for a Browns franchise intent on retooling quickly. If Cleveland can execute such a scenario, it could be regarded as a notable early-draft win for Monken’s rebuild plan.
