Newton also drew attention by blaming Arch Manning for the perceived shortcomings of the class, suggesting Manning’s absence from the draft altered the narrative surrounding this cycle. He argued Manning’s decision not to declare—and the hypothetical impact if he had—shaped how teams evaluate the prospects and their long-term potential.
Beyond pointing to this year’s group, Newton projected a brighter outlook for the 2027 quarterback class, predicting it could be the best in twenty years. He highlighted a strong slate of expected talents, including Arch Manning and several other rising names, and contrasted that optimism with memories of the 2020 draft, which produced multiple Pro Bowl quarterbacks.
The veteran QB also referenced historical draft outcomes, noting the 2007 class as a cautionary contrast to the potential of future groups. Newton’s comments aim to provoke discussion about the present class’s ceiling and the trajectory of quarterback development across the league.
In sum, Newton’s outspoken critique adds a layer of controversy to an already unpredictable draft season, while his future-facing view suggests renewed optimism for the quarterback landscape in 2027. His remarks have intensified conversations among fans, analysts, and teams evaluating which prospects might emerge as reliable long-term starters.
