ESPN’s March 1 feature suggested Montgomery could be headed elsewhere, noting his contract value and a potential trade return, with Seattle among teams imagined as a potential destination. Montgomery took to social media to dispute the claim, explicitly questioning whether the report reflected his own stance and signaling skepticism about the timing and sourcing of the information.
The broader context remains nuanced. Lions general manager Brad Holmes indicated that while he respects Montgomery and would welcome him to stay, the team is open to conversations about the player’s fit and future with Detroit. Montgomery, meanwhile, had indicated a positive outlook after the 2025-26 season, emphasizing teamwork and selflessness.
Montgomery’s contract situation includes two remaining years on his current deal, with a notable cap figure if he remains with Detroit. If a trade were to occur, it could impact the Lions’ financial flexibility and open cap space, depending on the structure of any potential move.
The situation illustrates the complexity of roster decisions in a results-driven offseason, where team needs, player desires, and contract implications intersect. While Montgomery is not ruling out a trade, he has publicly contested the latest report, leaving the door open for ongoing discussions rather than an imminent move.
As Detroit prepares its 2026-27 plan, the Lions remain engaged in trade conversations with other teams to optimize their lineup, while Montgomery’s stance appears to be a personal clarification rather than a definitive statement on his future with the franchise.
