Former NFL GM Mike Tannenbaum proposed a trade that would send Garrett to the Detroit Lions in return for three assets: the Browns’ 2026 and 2027 first-round picks, plus Lions wide receiver Jameson Williams. In exchange, Cleveland would receive Garrett, creating a stark shift in both teams’ outlooks.
Proponents argue the Browns would gain significant capital to reshape their roster, especially with three first-round picks in this year’s draft and an additional top pick in 2027. Williams would add dynamic playmaking to Cleveland’s receiving corps and gives the franchise a long-term building block under contract for four more seasons.
Detroit would acquire a proven, elite pass rusher to boost its defense, with the trade described as a potential game-changer for both teams. Analysts have noted that Cleveland might demand a higher price given Garrett’s stature, while Lions-general managers would weigh Garrett’s impact against the cost.
Following the proposal, analysts debated whether Cleveland should have moved Garrett earlier, with supporters arguing the franchise could maximize value by trading him now to accelerate their rebuild. Garrett remains under a four-year, $160 million extension, and the Browns’ decision will hinge on their evaluation of long-term return versus immediate on-field impact.
Garrett previously requested a trade after Cleveland’s underwhelming season, citing a desire to win at the highest level. He finished the season with 60 tackles and a single-season sack record, underscoring his low-risk, high-reward value in any potential trade scenario. The coming weeks will reveal whether the Browns pursue a deal or opt to keep Garrett as they recalibrate for the future.
