Pereles highlights Brisker’s ability to line up all over the field, serving as a blitzer, box defender, and run-stopper, while also noting his improved availability after a full 2025 season despite past concussion concerns. He cites Brisker’s postseason burst, including a standout NFC Divisional Round performance with 14 tackles, a sack, and two pass deflections, as evidence of his high upside.
While Brisker’s regular-season coverage numbers were imperfect—having yielded five touchdowns and a 127.6 passer rating when targeted—Pereles emphasizes that his run- and blitz-game impact compensates, with PFF ranking him 27th among 173 safeties in run defense and 23rd as a blitzer. Brisker logged a substantial role near the line of scrimmage (421 box snaps in 1,220 plays, including playoffs), underscoring his critical contribution to Chicago’s front-facing defense.
The contract discussion centers on value versus replacement cost. Brisker is projected to command roughly $10–$14 million annually, potentially around three years and $30–$33 million, a price tag that could test the Bears’ salary-cap planning given other secondary free agents like Kevin Byard, Nahshon Wright, C.J. Gardner-Jonzon, and Jonathan Owens.
Ultimately, Pereles argues that Brisker’s combination of rushing ability, tackling, and multi-formation versatility makes him difficult to replace, making him a high-priority target despite the Bears’ broader free-agent questions and secondary depth concerns. This assessment frames Brisker as a key decision in Chicago’s offseason strategy.
